National Education At The Beginning Of 2002

 

BUDGET OF THE MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION

EXPENDITURES IN THE LAST TWO YEARS USING THE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
FROM THE LAW NO 3418

EXPENDITURE ITEM
1999
2000
2001
(23.11.2001)
Current expenditures 3.300.469.510.874 5.131.842.139.361 12.189.485.018.141
Machinery equipment purchases 5.018.049.765.022 23.805.507.536.000 15.005.333.240.310
Construction Installation 55.894.103.196.000 77.753.974.000.000 45.193.245.000.000
Large repair expenditures 3.934.323.884.451 17.822.503.000.000 51.129.144.000.000
Expropriation and building purchases 4.000.000.000 561.000.000.000 325.000.000.000
Other expenditures 49.821.413 59.809.000.372 75.263.000.000
GENERAL TOTAL 68.150.996.177.760 125.134.635.675.733 123.917.470.258.451

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

 

EXPENDITURES IN THE LAST TWO YEARS IN VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION USING THE APPRENTICESHIP VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION FUND ESTABLISHED BY LAW NO 3308
AREAS OF EXPENDITURE
1999
2000
2001 (23.11.2001)
Additional wages for the workshop and vocational course teachers 317.659.273 814.599.820 922.547.320
Attendance Fees for the members of apprenticeship councils and examination fees 69.927.899 103.798.920 133.978.910
Machinery and equipment purchases for Vocational and Technical education institutions 833.018.249 1.232.040.670 623.552.610
Research and other expenses related to Vocational and Technical education 24.585.792 70.114.357 36.230.000
Purchase and publication of books related to Vocational and Technical education 14.733.249 64.800.450 10.172.400
In-service training of Vocational and Technical education teachers 5.110.700 - -
Incentive premium payments to the institutions educating apprenticeship and vocational high school students 557.768.073 732.423.300 -
Incentives for organizations giving vocational and technical training 15.000.000 15.000.000 -
TOTAL 1.837.803.235 3.032.772.517 1.726.481.240

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

2. HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS

DISTRIBUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS AMONG
TYPES OF ALLOCATION AND INCREMENT RATES
TYPE OF
ALLOCATION
1999
INCREMENT
RATE
(%)
2000
INCREMENT
RATE
(%)
2001
INCREMENT
RATE
(%)
2002
RECOMMENDED
INCREMEN
TRATE
(%)
Personnel 439.920.000 78 675.000.000. 53 850.851.600 26 1.547.043.000 81
Other current 52.950.000 58 81.150.000 53 104.800.000 29 242.695.000 131
capital expenses 145.924.000 19 249.508.000 71 347.600.000 39 624.490.000 79
Transfers 24.606.000 84 40.952.700 66 61.658.950 51 81.739.700 32
TOTAL 663.400.000 57 1.046.610.700 58 1.364.910.550 30 2.495.967.700 82

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

 

DISTRIBUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS AMONG TYPES OF ALLOCATION AND INCREMENT RATES
YEARS GNP CONSOLIDATED BUDGET HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET SHARE OF HEC IN GNP % RATIO OF HEC BUDGET TO CONSOLIDATED BUDGET
%
1990 397.177.500 64.400.354 2.505.362 0.63 3.89
1991 634.392.800 105.987.150 4.696.994 0.74 4.43
1992 1.103.604.900 208.545.328 9.122.902 0.83 4.37
1993 1.997.322.600 400.710.000 16.659.514 0.83 4.15
1994 3.887.902.900 826.396.307 31.182.000 0.80 3.77
1995 7.854.887.200 1.341.978.053 46.249.416 0.59 3.44
1996 14.978.067.300 3.568.506.822 92.172.760 0.61 2.58
1997 29.393.262.100 6.361.685.500 202.352.000 0.69 3.18
1998 53.012.780.600 14.789.475.000 422.657.000 0.80 2.85
1999 78.282.967.000 27.143.467.196 663.400.000 0.84 2.44
2000 125.970.544.000 46.713.341.000 1.046.610.700 0.83 2.24
2001 184.766.666.000 48.359.962.000 1.364.910.550 0.73 2.82
2002 280.550.667.000 98.071.000.000 2.495.967.700 0.88 2.54

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board


SHARES OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS WITHIN THE CONSOLIDATED BUDGET INVESTMENTS
YEARS
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET CAPITAL INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
HEC CAPITAL INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
SHARE (%)
1990 9.814.360 709.206 7.20
1991 15.052.650 1.199.014 7.90
1992 27.086.750 2.165.231 7.90
1993 46.225.500 3.759.940 08.10
1994 84.575.000 7.842.000 9.20
1995 89.275.215 9.878.703 11.00
1996 251.053.771 25.441.754 10.10
1997 524.600.000 63.143.000 12.10
1998 999.975.000 128.958.000 12.89
1999 1.410.000.000 145.924.000 10.34
2000 2.352.000.000 249.508.000 10.60
2001 3.500.000.000 347.600.000 9.93
2002 5.736.000.000 624.490.000 10.88

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

 

DISTRIBUTION OF YURT-KUR BUDGET TREASURY SUPPORT AMONG YEARS AND RATES OF INCREMENT
YEARS
YURT-KUR BUDGET
INCREMENT RATE %
TREASURY SUPPORT FOR YURT-KUR
INCREMENT RATE %
1997 30.563.000 108 27.700.000 108
1998 59.413.000 94 47.000.000 69
1999 112.988.209 90 85.000.000 81
2000 212.211.255 88 154.000.000 81
2001 299.475.007 41 241.500.000 57
2002 504.010.008 68 385.000.000 59

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

 

PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS IN CONSOLIDATED BUDGET CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
YEARS
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
YURT-KUR INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR INVESTMENTS IN CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS %
1997 521.190.000 3.478.000 0.66
1998 999.975.000 10.600.000 1.06
1999 1.410.000.000 24.700.000 1.75
2000 2.352.000.000 48.075.000 2.04
2001 3.500.000.000 50.000.000 1.42
2002 5.736.000.000 86.000.000 1.49

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

3. YURT-KUR BUDGET ALLOCATIONS

PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR BUDGET IN CONSOLIDATED BUDGET
YEARS
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET
YURT-KUR BUDGET
PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR BUDGET IN CONSOLIDATED BUDGET %
1990 64.040.354 413.155 0.64
1991 105.987.150 824.717 0.77
1992 208.545.328 1.071.475 0.51
1993 400.710.000 2.490.964 0.62
1994 826.396.307 4.000.000 0.48
1995 1.341.978.053 5.771.068 0.43
1996 3.568.506.822 14.646.966 0.41
1997 6.361.685.500 30.563.000 0.48
1998 14.789.475.000 59.413.000 0.40
1999 23.650.000.000 112.988.209 0.47
2000 46.713.341.000 212.211.255 0.45
2001 48.359.962.000 299.475.007 0.61
2002 98.071.000.000 504.010.008 0.51

RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board

4. EDUCATION INDICATORS OF OECD COUNTRIES

The size of youth population influences both the renewal of labor quality and the amount of resources and organizational efforts a country has to invest in education. A country with a high adult population should spare more of its national income for the education and training of its population. On the other hand, countries having less adult population are in a dilemma of long-term vs. short-term investments: a larger investment is needed to reproduce well-educated labor that can be retained longer in the business community.
A glance at the population distribution of the OECD countries reveals that in Ireland, Korea, Mexico and Turkey the percent of population between 5-29 within the whole population is above 40. The relative magnitude of the 5-14 age group is only 10% in Italy, Spain and Japan. On the other hand, Mexico and Turkey are the countries with the largest youth population, 23 and 21% respectively.
But Mexico and Turkey are also the two countries that reserve the least resources for education. *
The projections that determine the relative size of the school age population help to estimate the changes in the number of students and the amount of required resources. Based on the year 2000, (2000=100) the change expected in the next decade is that in many of the OECD countries the 5-14 age group will remain constant. The Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic are the two countries that shall have the most dramatic decrease in the next decade (24% or over). In Turkey, however, although a fall is experienced from 1995 to 2000, in the next decade the 5-14 age population is expected to increase a further 8%.
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001

PERCENTAGE OF 5-14 AGE GROUP IN THE POPULATION (1999)


EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE PERCENTAGE OF 5-14 AGE GROUP
IN THE POPULATION (2000=100)

 

*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001

A comparison of the OECD countries in terms of 15-19 age group reveals that the lowest percentage of this group is in Denmark and Italy. The highest percentage, 11%, is in Mexico and Turkey. Although Denmark presently has the lowest percentage, in the next decade the highest increase in the15-19 age group is expected in that country. The biggest fall shall be experienced in Poland and Ireland. In Turkey, while the percentage of 15-19 age group in the whole population was constant between 1995-2000, a fall of 8% is expected until 2010.

The amount of national resources allocated for education depends on interrelated supply and demand factors. One of them is the national income, besides others, such as demographical structure of population, enrolment rates, etc.

In 1998 all OECD countries receive a certain share from the national resources for education. Considering all levels of education, the OECD countries allocate an average of 5.7% for education from the GDP. This percent is 3.71 for the primary, secondary and post-secondary - non tertiary education levels. Austria, France, Sweden and Norway allocate more than 4% of the GDP for education. In Turkey this percentage is 2.33.

Education expenditures may be grouped into two, as current and investment expenditures. Some significant differences exist among the countries in terms of percentages of current and investment expenditures. The data range of current expenditures for primary, secondary, post secondary - non tertiary education levels is 83 and 84% in Korea and Turkey, where it changes up to 97 and 98% in Canada and Belgium. Also, looking at the distribution of current expenditures, we see that the largest share is personnel compensations. Mexico (91%), Portugal (94%) and Turkey (96%) are the countries that spend the largest amount for personnel compensations among other current expenditures.

PERCENTAGE OF THE 15-19 AGE GROUP IN THE POPULATION (1999)

EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE PERCENTAGE OF 15-19 AGE GROUP
IN THE POPULATION (2000=100)

*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001

 

NB: The post-secondary - non tertiary education level does not exist in 12 of the 30 OECD countries, namely the Czech Republic, Greece, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Holland, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey.

SHARE OF EXPENDITURES FOR EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
WITHIN GDP (1998)


*Not including the public and private support provided for the household.
Note: The expenditures are those made for primary and secondary education. Expenditures are also included for those countries where a post-secondary and non tertiary education level exists (excluding the USA).
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001

DISTRIBUTION OF CURRENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (1998)


*Expenditures of public institutions only
**Expenditures of public and Government-dependent private institutions only
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001

DISTRIBUTION OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES
(1998)

*Expenditures of public institutions only
**Expenditures of public and Government-dependent private institutions only

*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001

 

Previous

Next

Click here to print this page

Main Page

Table of Contents

©2002 Republic Of Turkey
Ministry Of National Education
All Rights Reserved.