BUDGET OF THE MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION
EXPENDITURES IN THE LAST TWO YEARS USING THE ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES
FROM THE LAW NO 3418
|
EXPENDITURE ITEM
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
(23.11.2001)
|
| Current expenditures |
3.300.469.510.874 |
5.131.842.139.361 |
12.189.485.018.141 |
| Machinery equipment purchases |
5.018.049.765.022 |
23.805.507.536.000 |
15.005.333.240.310 |
| Construction Installation |
55.894.103.196.000 |
77.753.974.000.000 |
45.193.245.000.000 |
| Large repair expenditures |
3.934.323.884.451 |
17.822.503.000.000 |
51.129.144.000.000 |
| Expropriation and building purchases |
4.000.000.000 |
561.000.000.000 |
325.000.000.000 |
| Other expenditures |
49.821.413 |
59.809.000.372 |
75.263.000.000 |
| GENERAL TOTAL |
68.150.996.177.760 |
125.134.635.675.733 |
123.917.470.258.451 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
|
EXPENDITURES IN THE LAST TWO YEARS IN VOCATIONAL
AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION USING THE APPRENTICESHIP VOCATIONAL AND
TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION FUND ESTABLISHED BY
LAW NO 3308
|
| AREAS OF EXPENDITURE |
1999
|
2000
|
2001 (23.11.2001)
|
| Additional wages for the workshop and vocational course teachers |
317.659.273 |
814.599.820 |
922.547.320 |
| Attendance Fees for the members of apprenticeship councils and examination
fees |
69.927.899 |
103.798.920 |
133.978.910 |
| Machinery and equipment purchases for Vocational and Technical education
institutions |
833.018.249 |
1.232.040.670 |
623.552.610 |
| Research and other expenses related to Vocational and Technical
education |
24.585.792 |
70.114.357 |
36.230.000 |
| Purchase and publication of books related to Vocational and Technical
education |
14.733.249 |
64.800.450 |
10.172.400 |
| In-service training of Vocational and Technical education teachers |
5.110.700 |
- |
- |
| Incentive premium payments to the institutions educating apprenticeship
and vocational high school students |
557.768.073 |
732.423.300 |
- |
| Incentives for organizations giving vocational and technical training |
15.000.000 |
15.000.000 |
- |
| TOTAL |
1.837.803.235 |
3.032.772.517 |
1.726.481.240 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
2. HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
|
DISTRIBUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION
COUNCIL BUDGET ALLOCATIONS AMONG
TYPES OF ALLOCATION AND INCREMENT RATES
|
|
TYPE OF
ALLOCATION
|
1999
|
INCREMENT
RATE
(%)
|
2000
|
INCREMENT
RATE
(%)
|
2001
|
INCREMENT
RATE
(%)
|
2002
RECOMMENDED
|
INCREMEN
TRATE
(%)
|
| Personnel |
439.920.000 |
78 |
675.000.000. |
53 |
850.851.600 |
26 |
1.547.043.000 |
81 |
| Other current |
52.950.000 |
58 |
81.150.000 |
53 |
104.800.000 |
29 |
242.695.000 |
131 |
| capital expenses |
145.924.000 |
19 |
249.508.000 |
71 |
347.600.000 |
39 |
624.490.000 |
79 |
| Transfers |
24.606.000 |
84 |
40.952.700 |
66 |
61.658.950 |
51 |
81.739.700 |
32 |
| TOTAL |
663.400.000 |
57 |
1.046.610.700 |
58 |
1.364.910.550 |
30 |
2.495.967.700 |
82 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
|
DISTRIBUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET
ALLOCATIONS AMONG TYPES OF ALLOCATION AND INCREMENT RATES
|
| YEARS |
GNP |
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET |
HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL BUDGET |
SHARE OF HEC IN GNP % |
RATIO OF HEC BUDGET TO CONSOLIDATED
BUDGET
% |
| 1990 |
397.177.500 |
64.400.354 |
2.505.362 |
0.63 |
3.89 |
| 1991 |
634.392.800 |
105.987.150 |
4.696.994 |
0.74 |
4.43 |
| 1992 |
1.103.604.900 |
208.545.328 |
9.122.902 |
0.83 |
4.37 |
| 1993 |
1.997.322.600 |
400.710.000 |
16.659.514 |
0.83 |
4.15 |
| 1994 |
3.887.902.900 |
826.396.307 |
31.182.000 |
0.80 |
3.77 |
| 1995 |
7.854.887.200 |
1.341.978.053 |
46.249.416 |
0.59 |
3.44 |
| 1996 |
14.978.067.300 |
3.568.506.822 |
92.172.760 |
0.61 |
2.58 |
| 1997 |
29.393.262.100 |
6.361.685.500 |
202.352.000 |
0.69 |
3.18 |
| 1998 |
53.012.780.600 |
14.789.475.000 |
422.657.000 |
0.80 |
2.85 |
| 1999 |
78.282.967.000 |
27.143.467.196 |
663.400.000 |
0.84 |
2.44 |
| 2000 |
125.970.544.000 |
46.713.341.000 |
1.046.610.700 |
0.83 |
2.24 |
| 2001 |
184.766.666.000 |
48.359.962.000 |
1.364.910.550 |
0.73 |
2.82 |
| 2002 |
280.550.667.000 |
98.071.000.000 |
2.495.967.700 |
0.88 |
2.54 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
|
SHARES OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL CAPITAL
INVESTMENTS WITHIN THE CONSOLIDATED BUDGET INVESTMENTS
|
| YEARS |
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET CAPITAL INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
|
HEC CAPITAL INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
|
SHARE (%)
|
| 1990 |
9.814.360 |
709.206 |
7.20 |
| 1991 |
15.052.650 |
1.199.014 |
7.90 |
| 1992 |
27.086.750 |
2.165.231 |
7.90 |
| 1993 |
46.225.500 |
3.759.940 |
08.10 |
| 1994 |
84.575.000 |
7.842.000 |
9.20 |
| 1995 |
89.275.215 |
9.878.703 |
11.00 |
| 1996 |
251.053.771 |
25.441.754 |
10.10 |
| 1997 |
524.600.000 |
63.143.000 |
12.10 |
| 1998 |
999.975.000 |
128.958.000 |
12.89 |
| 1999 |
1.410.000.000 |
145.924.000 |
10.34 |
| 2000 |
2.352.000.000 |
249.508.000 |
10.60 |
| 2001 |
3.500.000.000 |
347.600.000 |
9.93 |
| 2002 |
5.736.000.000 |
624.490.000 |
10.88 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
|
DISTRIBUTION OF YURT-KUR BUDGET TREASURY SUPPORT
AMONG YEARS AND RATES OF INCREMENT
|
|
YEARS
|
YURT-KUR BUDGET
|
INCREMENT RATE %
|
TREASURY SUPPORT FOR YURT-KUR
|
INCREMENT RATE %
|
| 1997 |
30.563.000 |
108 |
27.700.000 |
108 |
| 1998 |
59.413.000 |
94 |
47.000.000 |
69 |
| 1999 |
112.988.209 |
90 |
85.000.000 |
81 |
| 2000 |
212.211.255 |
88 |
154.000.000 |
81 |
| 2001 |
299.475.007 |
41 |
241.500.000 |
57 |
| 2002 |
504.010.008 |
68 |
385.000.000 |
59 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
|
PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
IN CONSOLIDATED BUDGET CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
|
|
YEARS
|
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
|
YURT-KUR INVESTMENT ALLOCATION
|
PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR INVESTMENTS IN CONSOLIDATED
INVESTMENTS %
|
| 1997 |
521.190.000 |
3.478.000 |
0.66 |
| 1998 |
999.975.000 |
10.600.000 |
1.06 |
| 1999 |
1.410.000.000 |
24.700.000 |
1.75 |
| 2000 |
2.352.000.000 |
48.075.000 |
2.04 |
| 2001 |
3.500.000.000 |
50.000.000 |
1.42 |
| 2002 |
5.736.000.000 |
86.000.000 |
1.49 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
3. YURT-KUR BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
|
PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR BUDGET IN CONSOLIDATED
BUDGET
|
|
YEARS
|
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET
|
YURT-KUR BUDGET
|
PERCENTAGE OF YURT-KUR BUDGET IN CONSOLIDATED
BUDGET %
|
| 1990 |
64.040.354 |
413.155 |
0.64 |
| 1991 |
105.987.150 |
824.717 |
0.77 |
| 1992 |
208.545.328 |
1.071.475 |
0.51 |
| 1993 |
400.710.000 |
2.490.964 |
0.62 |
| 1994 |
826.396.307 |
4.000.000 |
0.48 |
| 1995 |
1.341.978.053 |
5.771.068 |
0.43 |
| 1996 |
3.568.506.822 |
14.646.966 |
0.41 |
| 1997 |
6.361.685.500 |
30.563.000 |
0.48 |
| 1998 |
14.789.475.000 |
59.413.000 |
0.40 |
| 1999 |
23.650.000.000 |
112.988.209 |
0.47 |
| 2000 |
46.713.341.000 |
212.211.255 |
0.45 |
| 2001 |
48.359.962.000 |
299.475.007 |
0.61 |
| 2002 |
98.071.000.000 |
504.010.008 |
0.51 |
RESOURCE: MNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board
4. EDUCATION INDICATORS OF OECD COUNTRIES
The size of youth population influences both the renewal of labor quality
and the amount of resources and organizational efforts a country has to
invest in education. A country with a high adult population should spare
more of its national income for the education and training of its population.
On the other hand, countries having less adult population are in a dilemma
of long-term vs. short-term investments: a larger investment is needed
to reproduce well-educated labor that can be retained longer in the business
community.
A glance at the population distribution of the OECD countries reveals
that in Ireland, Korea, Mexico and Turkey the percent of population between
5-29 within the whole population is above 40. The relative magnitude of
the 5-14 age group is only 10% in Italy, Spain and Japan. On the other
hand, Mexico and Turkey are the countries with the largest youth population,
23 and 21% respectively.
But Mexico and Turkey are also the two countries that reserve the least
resources for education. *
The projections that determine the relative size of the school age population
help to estimate the changes in the number of students and the amount
of required resources. Based on the year 2000, (2000=100) the change expected
in the next decade is that in many of the OECD countries the 5-14 age
group will remain constant. The Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic
are the two countries that shall have the most dramatic decrease in the
next decade (24% or over). In Turkey, however, although a fall is experienced
from 1995 to 2000, in the next decade the 5-14 age population is expected
to increase a further 8%.
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001
PERCENTAGE OF 5-14 AGE GROUP IN THE POPULATION (1999)
EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE PERCENTAGE OF 5-14 AGE GROUP
IN THE POPULATION (2000=100)
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001
A comparison of the OECD countries in terms of 15-19 age
group reveals that the lowest percentage of this group is in Denmark and
Italy. The highest percentage, 11%, is in Mexico and Turkey. Although
Denmark presently has the lowest percentage, in the next decade the highest
increase in the15-19 age group is expected in that country. The biggest
fall shall be experienced in Poland and Ireland. In Turkey, while the
percentage of 15-19 age group in the whole population was constant between
1995-2000, a fall of 8% is expected until 2010.
The amount of national resources allocated for education depends on interrelated
supply and demand factors. One of them is the national income, besides
others, such as demographical structure of population, enrolment rates,
etc.
In 1998 all OECD countries receive a certain share from the national
resources for education. Considering all levels of education, the OECD
countries allocate an average of 5.7% for education from the GDP. This
percent is 3.71 for the primary, secondary and post-secondary - non tertiary
education levels. Austria, France, Sweden and Norway allocate more than
4% of the GDP for education. In Turkey this percentage is 2.33.
Education expenditures may be grouped into two, as current and investment
expenditures. Some significant differences exist among the countries in
terms of percentages of current and investment expenditures. The data
range of current expenditures for primary, secondary, post secondary -
non tertiary education levels is 83 and 84% in Korea and Turkey, where
it changes up to 97 and 98% in Canada and Belgium. Also, looking at the
distribution of current expenditures, we see that the largest share is
personnel compensations. Mexico (91%), Portugal (94%) and Turkey (96%)
are the countries that spend the largest amount for personnel compensations
among other current expenditures.
PERCENTAGE OF THE 15-19 AGE GROUP IN THE POPULATION
(1999)
EXPECTED CHANGE IN THE PERCENTAGE OF 15-19 AGE GROUP
IN THE POPULATION (2000=100)
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001
NB: The post-secondary - non tertiary education level does not exist
in 12 of the 30 OECD countries, namely the Czech Republic, Greece, Iceland,
Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Holland, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey.
SHARE OF EXPENDITURES FOR EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
WITHIN GDP (1998)

*Not including the public and private support provided for the household.
Note: The expenditures are those made for primary and secondary education.
Expenditures are also included for those countries where a post-secondary
and non tertiary education level exists (excluding the USA).
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001
DISTRIBUTION OF CURRENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (1998)

*Expenditures of public institutions only
**Expenditures of public and Government-dependent private institutions
only
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001
DISTRIBUTION OF CURRENT EXPENDITURES
(1998)
*Expenditures of public institutions only
**Expenditures of public and Government-dependent private institutions
only
*OECD, Education At a Glance, Paris, 2001
|